Bug 292991 - (CVE-2007-6025) CVE-2007-6025 Stack overflow when handling TSF from the driver
CVE-2007-6025 Stack overflow when handling TSF from the driver
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep...
reported=20070917,public=20070915,sou...
: Security
Depends On: 293001 293011
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-09-17 06:03 EDT by Lubomir Kundrak
Modified: 2007-11-20 03:17 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-17 10:27:35 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The proposed Debian patch (731 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2007-09-17 06:03 EDT, Lubomir Kundrak
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Lubomir Kundrak 2007-09-17 06:03:51 EDT
Description of problem:

Kees Cook reported this to the Debian BTS:
There is a stack overflow in wpa_supplicant when handling TSF info from
drivers that support it.  Patch attached.
Comment 1 Lubomir Kundrak 2007-09-17 06:03:51 EDT
Created attachment 197231 [details]
The proposed Debian patch
Comment 4 Dan Williams 2007-09-17 10:27:35 EDT
I do not believe that any version of Fedora or RHEL is vulnerable due to this
problem, because we do not ship a version of wpa_supplicant that is new enough
to have TSF-related code.  I have quickly checked all other instances of
hexstr2bin and they all appear to be correctly determining the length of the
returned buffer. 

We ship wpa_supplicant 0.5.7 in F-7 and rawhide, 0.4.9 in FC-6, and no version
greater than 0.5.7 in RHEL.  Shall I mark as NOTABUG?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.