Bug 2939 - Upgrade 5.2 -> 6.0 does not install all files!
Summary: Upgrade 5.2 -> 6.0 does not install all files!
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2727
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: tetex   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Cristian Gafton
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-05-20 17:58 UTC by Hardy Mayer
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-05-21 04:08:05 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Hardy Mayer 1999-05-20 17:58:13 UTC
The upgrade 5.2->6.0 (from Cheapbytes CD-ROM) left the
following two directories empty:
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/public/cm.

I had to run rpm -ihv --force 2 or 3 times on
tetex-0.9-17.i386.rpm
tetex-latex-0.9-17.i386.rpm
tetex-afm-0.9-17.i386.rpm
to get all the files properly installed.

This happened on two different machine -- so it wasn't a
fluke, and the rpm files were identical to those on the
mirros of the distribution.

Comment 1 Derek Tattersall 1999-05-20 19:44:59 UTC
Did a cdrom upgrade 5.2->6.0 using Red Hat media.  When completed
the directories /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base and
/usr/share/texmffontssource/public/cm were empty.  The tetex rpm
contains entries for the files in the second directory, and
tetex-latex contains entries in the first directory.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 1999-05-21 04:08:59 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2727 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.