Bug 30702 – rpm-spec-mode can't build packages in emacs

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on December 2, 2018. The outage period for the upgrade will start at 0:00 UTC and have a duration of 12 hours

Bug 30702 - rpm-spec-mode can't build packages in emacs

Summary:	rpm-spec-mode can't build packages in emacs

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	emacs (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
QA Contact:	Aaron Brown
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-03-05 16:33 EST by Jeremy Katz
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:31 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-03-08 12:00:05 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jeremy Katz 2001-03-05 16:33:43 EST

rpm-spec-mode uses replace-in-string which only exists in xemacs and not in
standard GNU Emacs which prevents you from using the package building bits
of rpm-spec-mode.  rpm-spec-mode should either only be installed to work
with xemacs or be fixed (I had tried an older version of rpm-spec-mode at
one point before it made it into the package and it worked fine)

Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-03-05 17:25:43 EST

Verified. I mainlu use it for C-c e and C-c r, and hadn't noticed. Emacs 21 has
"replace-regexp-in-string", not quite sure what to use for Emacs 20. I've
notified the author.

Comment 2 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-03-07 14:47:51 EST

It's fixed in 0.11e, available from http://www.tihlde.org/~stigb/rpm-spec-mode.el

I've put together a emacs-20.7-33, which isn't yet in the tree.

Comment 3 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-03-08 11:59:59 EST

It is now.

Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2001-03-08 12:04:03 EST

Looks good; thanks

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.