Bug 31816 – upgrade to 2.4.2-0.1.28 breaks dhcp setting default router

This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-09-28. It is expected to last about 1 hours

Bug 31816 - upgrade to 2.4.2-0.1.28 breaks dhcp setting default router

Summary:	upgrade to 2.4.2-0.1.28 breaks dhcp setting default router

Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification:	Retired
Component:	kernel (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	1.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact:	Brock Organ
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-03-14 21:08 EST by James Manning
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:32 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-03-15 13:29:28 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description James Manning 2001-03-14 21:08:09 EST

upgrading from 2.4.2-0.1.16 to 2.4.2-0.1.28 breaks the setting of the
default route from eth0, which is dhcp from a cable modem.  Going back
to 0.1.16 and it works again.  All other route table entries are fine,
just the default route isn't getting set.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2001-03-14 21:18:17 EST

Weird. Are you sure you didn't install initscripts-5.75 in the interim? :)

Comment 2 James Manning 2001-03-14 21:28:55 EST

which is why i said booting back to 0.1.16 gets it working again :)

initscripts-5.00-1 is what's installed... did 0.1.28 need a dep
that it was missing?

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2001-03-14 22:25:27 EST

No, it's just that that version (5.75-1) of initscripts has the
exact same effect. :)

Comment 4 Michael K. Johnson 2001-03-15 12:38:59 EST

What ethernet card?

Comment 5 James Manning 2001-03-15 12:43:10 EST

Jeremy Katz suggested upgrading pump, but since it's largely still a
RH6.2 system, I can't, and it doesn't build from src.rpm... but anyway.

jmm@bp6:/home/jmm> rpm -q pump
pump-0.7.8-1

the dhcp ethernet card is the tulip driver, FA310TX card

00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 20)
        Subsystem: Netgear FA310TX
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 11
        I/O ports at c400 [size=256]
        Memory at d900b000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
        Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=256K]

Comment 6 Michael K. Johnson 2001-03-15 13:11:17 EST

Arjan, any recent changes to tulip?

Comment 7 Arjan van de Ven 2001-03-15 13:29:24 EST

No. 0.1.28 has 2 possible bad guys:
1) the updated zerocopy patch
2) slab poison

Comment 8 James Manning 2001-11-26 02:09:01 EST

this has been working for awhile now - closing

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.