Bug 32639 – 6.2->7.1 upgrade: unresolved dependency --> no sugg.

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 32639 - 6.2->7.1 upgrade: unresolved dependency --> no sugg.

Summary:	6.2->7.1 upgrade: unresolved dependency --> no sugg.

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	anaconda (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Matt Wilson
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-03-21 22:39 EST by Ben Levenson
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-03-29 12:17:33 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Ben Levenson 2001-03-21 22:39:58 EST

build qa0321.2
TUI-CDROM upgrade
6.2 Everything --> 7.1
Unresolved dependency.
Afterstep-APPS --> no suggestion

Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-03-22 08:20:51 EST

We're no longer shipping Afterstep-Apps (and the 6.x version is using obsolete 
libraries, of course).

I can't think of a real fix for this problem (should anaconda requiring 
ancient libraries if there's no update available?)...

Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2001-03-22 10:39:45 EST

Matt any ideas?

Comment 3 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-03-22 10:45:01 EST

Just noticed the typo in my comment - s/requiring/remove packages requiring/g 
of course.

Comment 4 Matt Wilson 2001-03-22 11:01:44 EST

we shouldn't remove packages which have broken dependencies...  isn't there
something that obsoletes afterstep-apps?

anyway - the installer is doing the requested behavior now.

Comment 5 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-03-22 11:07:01 EST

Nothing obsoletes Afterstep-APPS - we removed the AfterStep window manager 
without replacement, so we can't obsolete Afterstep-APPS either.

Comment 6 Matt Wilson 2001-03-22 18:22:36 EST

This should be working properly in tomorrow's tree.

Comment 7 Ben Levenson 2001-03-28 14:27:52 EST

build qa0328.0
6.2 "Everything" -> 7.1 TUI-CDROM
Unresolved dep. is still present:
AfterStep-APPS --> no sugg.
The following message was displayed on vc3:
* depcheck: package AfterStep-APPS needs libwraster.so.1 (not provided)

Comment 8 Matt Wilson 2001-03-29 12:17:30 EST

the installer is doing the right thing.

Comment 9 Ben Levenson 2001-04-05 19:53:24 EDT

closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.