Bug 32836 - Lilo not set up correctly
Summary: Lilo not set up correctly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda
Version: 7.1
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Fulbright
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2001-03-23 17:47 UTC by Chris Ricker
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:32 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-03-23 17:47:25 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Ricker 2001-03-23 17:47:21 UTC
This is with qa0322.

After the install, it just comes up with LI and hangs trying to execute the
secondary loader.

During the install, I selected automatic partitioning.  I also unselected
to install LILO to the mbr, and told it to install only to the partition
instead.  Partitioning created

/		hda5 (active)
/boot		hda1
swap		hda6

and anaconda created a lilo.conf file of

boot=/dev/hda1
map=/boot/map
install=/boot/boot.b
prompt
timeout=50
message=/boot/message
linear
default=linux

image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2-0.1.32
	label=linux
	read-only
	root=/dev/hda5


which should all be fine.  It doesn't work, however.  I can get it to work
by switching to installing LILO to the MBR (boot=/dev/hda), installing
lilo, and then switching it back (boot=/dev/hda1) and re-installing lilo.

I shouldn't have to do all that to have lilo on the active partition
instead.  I suspect the problem is that the machine doesn't have an MBR
until I do the whole double-install of lilo.  Anaconda really should be
dropping a generic MBR on there....

Comment 1 Matt Wilson 2001-03-23 23:00:26 UTC
that LI must be from an old copy of LILO you installed on the MBR.  We can't go
around replacing people's MBRs if they select to install LILO on a partition -
people may have a different boot manager installed on the MBR.


Comment 2 Chris Ricker 2001-03-23 23:59:39 UTC
Oh, that makes sense.  I thought I'd zero'd the drive.

I'll do another install after zeroing to double-check, but definitely leave this
one resolved for now.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.