Bug 329011 – RHBA reference Galaxy, should reference IBM eHCA

Bug 329011 - RHBA reference Galaxy, should reference IBM eHCA

Summary:	RHBA reference Galaxy, should reference IBM eHCA

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	Documentation (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	5.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	urgent Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Brian Forte
QA Contact:	Content Services Development
Docs Contact:

URL:	http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-200...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Documentation

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-10-12 01:36 EDT by Wade Mealing
Modified:	2014-06-18 03:49 EDT (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-10-24 19:51:09 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center	37635	None	None	None	Never

Groups: None (edit)

Description Wade Mealing 2007-10-12 01:36:01 EDT

Description of problem:

As of: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0736.html

 * HTS can detect Galaxy InfiniBand network devices.

We would like this changed to:

 * HTS can detect IBM eHCA InfiniBand network devices.

the name 'Galaxy' is an IBM Internal product name, and would not mean anything
to a customer.  As such, a customer is not likely to recognize it as relevant to
them.  A owner or user of an eHCA device would recognize the name eHCA.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Fri Oct 12 03:27:56 EST 2007

Comment 3 Brian Forte 2007-10-23 23:35:09 EDT

I've edited the incorrect text (and corrected a few typos for good measure) at 
<http://errata.devel.redhat.com/errata/show/6011> and approved the corrected text.

I can't, however, re-publish the note.

A ticket has been raised with Release Engineering re re-publishing the note:
<https://engineering.redhat.com/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=17207>

Comment 4 Brian Forte 2007-10-24 19:51:09 EDT

Errata has been re-published. Corrected text is now public-facing, replacing the previous erroneous 
copy.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.