Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 329301
Missing space in message 1 Paket-Installation wurde eingeplant fürvmware139.englab.brq.redhat.com.
Last modified: 2008-04-02 17:07:13 EDT
Description of problem: After I've installed hotfix package for bug 329211, I've successfully initiated installation of the package. However, in German version, there is missing space in the blue oval message. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Satellite 5.0.1 How reproducible: Tried once, looking at the code it seems to be deterministic. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Switch to German UI. 2. Make sure you have Satellite which includes fix for bug 270561 or 329211. 3. Register system. 4. Go in the Systeme-><systemname>->Software->Installation, select a package, hit Ausgewählte Pakete installieren button, hit Bestätigen button. Actual results: 1 Paket-Installation wurde eingeplant fürvmware139.englab.brq.redhat.com. (of course, the system name will differ). Expected results: 1 Paket-Installation wurde eingeplant für vmware139.englab.brq.redhat.com. (of course, the system name will differ). Additional info:
reassigning to jha for translation team to take a look at the current string resource files.
Reassigning to Fabien Decroux for Satellite translation issue.
Hi John, In this case (missing space in 1 spcecific sentence for de-DE only): Do you think it would be possible to correct it directly in the database? Cheers, Fabien
I can't do that directly. However, I am CCing Jesus Rodriguez from RHN team to take a look at this UI issue.
I'm doing a mass search and purge of bugs assigned to RHN and Satellite docs that are issues pertaining to CSS layout and formatting in the rendering of docs on the Satellite Help page (and/or rhn.redhat.com). Changing component to WebUI and re-assigning this bug to Jesus in RHN engineering as he has domain over such issues.
Reassigning to bbuckingham.
Added missing space to StringResource_de.xml.
This had to be fixed in java.po as part of the RHN Satellite GUI files. Revision 2771 is the corrected version. Cheers, Timo
Pardon me, but how did something that involved fixing stuff become NOTABUG?
That was a mistake. Suppose the fix will be included in the next errata update so changing status to ERRATA
Actually, for our process this has to be marked as ON_QA... but as this is so late, I'm going to mark it Verified so we can check it in stage.
Looks good. Release Pending.
UI Enhancements for 5.1 Sat GA so Closed for Current Release.