Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 338681
Review Request: eboard - ICS chess board interface
Last modified: 2007-12-12 10:17:11 EST
Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/eboard/eboard.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/eboard/eboard-1.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: eboard Internet chess board interface
Builds OK, although I have to admit I don't understand why you change -O6 into -O2 in the configure script, then run it, then change -O2 to %{optflags} in the generated makefile. But it's not like it matters. Is there any upstream at all for this software? The spec has no URL: tag, and Source0: isn't a URL either. I'm guessing that a proper URL: would be "http://www.bergo.eng.br/eboard/" and Source0: should be "http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2". rpmlint says: eboard.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man6 eboard.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 Definite blocker here; the package should not own these directories. eboard.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/eboard-config I'm not sure what the point of the -config script is since there aren't any libraries or headers, but I think it would be pointless to make a -devel package just for it. Still, do you know what this is used for? It doesn't supply any useful information, and the --datadir output seems actively wrong (should be /usr/share/eboard, I'd think, but it's just /usr/share). eboard.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized eboard chess board interface There's not usually any need to include the package name in the Summary: since "eboard - eboard chess board interface" is a bit redundant. eboard.x86_64: E: no-description-tag You definitely need something in your %description. eboard.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog See the "Changelogs" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for the proper changelog formats. eboard.x86_64: W: no-url-tag Should at least point to the upstream website.
Setting NEEDINFO.
ping again?
Once closing as NOTABUG. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request, thanks!!