Bug 342151 - multiarch conflicts in libgnome-java
Summary: multiarch conflicts in libgnome-java
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libgnome-java
Version: 9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Stepan Kasal
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-10-19 21:46 UTC by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-17 03:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-30 15:01:23 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Bill Nottingham 2007-10-19 21:46:34 UTC
libgnome-java (or one of its subpacakges) has multiarch conflicts when installed for both i386 and x86_64 in the Fedora development tree. For help in resolving them, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks. 

  file /usr/share/doc/libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4/api/alphaindex.html from install of libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4-6.fc7 conflicts with file from package libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4-6.fc7
  file /usr/share/doc/libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4/api/org/gnu/gnome/RestartStyle.html from install of libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4-6.fc7 conflicts with file from package libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4-6.fc7
  file /usr/share/doc/libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4/api/org/gnu/gnome/package-summary.html from install of libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4-6.fc7 conflicts with file from package libgnome-java-devel-2.12.4-6.fc7

(Note that this is an automated bug filing.)
It would be nice to have these bugs fixed by the beta of Fedora 9.

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 03:33:53 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Stepan Kasal 2009-04-30 15:01:23 UTC
These old java-gnome packages are no longer supported upstream, so we should
probably phase them out as well; thus it is not worth it to fix the conflict.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.