Bug 3429 - Problem viewing latex included eps files with xdvi.
Problem viewing latex included eps files with xdvi.
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: tetex (Show other bugs)
6.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 1999-06-13 09:25 EDT by roland.kay
Modified: 2017-01-03 19:45 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-09-05 11:24:09 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description roland.kay 1999-06-13 09:25:19 EDT
I am including gzipped eps files in a latex document as
follows...

\newcommand{\incloggrf}[2][1.0] { % Include a graphic
\includegraphics[width=#1\textwidth]{/path/to/logbook/#2.eps.gz}
}

\begin{figure}
\incloggrf{bin0}
\caption{}
\label{}
\end{figure}

When viewing the resulting .dvi file, xdvi frequently
reports...

/tmp/xdvicwmkog/xdvik9TKkCF: File exists

In the viewer some of the .eps files are replaced with
others from elsewhere in the document or are missing.

Latex finds the .eps.gz files and each has a corresponding
.eps.bb file containing the BoundingBox line.

If dvips is used to convert the .dvi file to a postscript
file then gv displays the resulting .ps file correctly.

My system is Intel Pentium 166Mhz, Kernel 2.2.9, Redhat 6.0
upto date with the current errata.
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 1999-06-16 08:42:59 EDT
Can you verify if your problem is still present in tetex-1.0.1
(available through Raw Hide)? Thanks ...
Comment 2 roland.kay 1999-06-19 04:32:59 EDT
I've just verified this bug with the latest tetex release (1.0.1-2)
The output of xdvi is as follows...

% xdvi report
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu0
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu1
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu2
/tmp/xdvidifMAu0: File exists
/tmp/xdvidifMAu1: File exists
/tmp/xdvidifMAu2: File exists
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu3
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu4
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu5
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu6
TMP file: /tmp/xdvidifMAu7
/tmp/xdvidifMAu0: File exists
/tmp/xdvidifMAu1: File exists
/tmp/xdvidifMAu2: File exists
/tmp/xdvidifMAu3: File exists
Comment 3 Jeff Johnson 1999-08-13 09:43:59 EDT
Can you send an example file that exhibits this problem? Thanks.
Comment 4 Jeff Johnson 1999-09-05 11:24:59 EDT
I'd like to get this last tetex problem resolved but I need
a simple test case. Does anyone have a simple test case or
a report that this is not a problem with the latest tetex
from Raw Hide? Thanks.
Comment 5 openshift-github-bot 2017-01-03 19:45:45 EST
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs

https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/e458e711b510ae76d4e240eaeffdbc6964eaa6d0
Merge pull request #3437 from bfallonf/nexus_issue_3429

Issue 3429 fixed context path

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.