Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 344691
kernel-188.8.131.52-23.fc8 fails to resume
Last modified: 2007-12-04 12:36:45 EST
Description of problem:
laptop hard disk inaccessible after a suspend-to-ram-resume cycle. kernel prints
"journal commit I/O error" and "sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result:
hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK" (or something to that
effect, I had to write it down).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-184.108.40.206-23.fc8 known-bad, kernel-220.127.116.11-65.fc7 known-good. Sorry,
that's a wide window, I know.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. pm-suspend (or trigger the same by gnome-power-manager)
3. try to write to disk (or read outside of cache, I think)
Created attachment 233651 [details]
lspci -v -nn output
What kind of laptop?
Acer TravelMate 6292, Core 2 Duo, Santa Rosa chipset. The attachment has the
hardware details. I've been suspending and resuming this quite (but not 100%)
reliably through gnome-power-manager and hal since I got it this summer under
the F7 kernels. What instability I've had with it has been related to X and the
Intel driver, but these days that's quite good as well. I believe this is the
first kernel-related issue I've seen with the machine.
Tighter window -- the last F7 update kernel kernel-18.104.22.168-91.fc7 works, and
the first F8 test kernel kernel-2.6.23-0.164.rc5.fc8 does not.
I found kernel-22.214.171.124-10.fc7 from koji. This kernel works.
On the other hand, kernel-126.96.36.199-30.fc8 does not. I hope these are close
enough to each other to see the difference...
Still continue to have the problem with kernel-188.8.131.52-42.fc8. Certainly seems
to be some systematic difference between F7 and F8 kernel profiles.
Which kernel: i686 or x86_64?
Oh, sorry, neglected to mention that. i686.
kernel-184.108.40.206-63.fc8.i686 from updates-testing works