This one really falls in the nit-picking category, and I would have given it ultra-low priority if possible--- but being a fan of the ISO 8601 date format (CCYY-MM-DD, eg. 1999-06-14), I could not help but notice the inconsistent use of date formats in the several Bugzilla screens, eg: ... Opened: 1999-05-03 ... ------- Additional Comments ... 05/03/99 11:01 ------- ... Note that the first date seems OK, but is probably not, ccyy-dd-mm in lieu of ccyy-mm-dd and the second does not have cc (century). Furthermore, both dates are specific for the US; Europe mostly uses dd-mm-ccyy notation. ISO 8601 has all sorts of nice qualities, such as millenium- proofness, numerical and lexical ordering == date ordering etc. Also note that in 2001 etc. dates will look strange, what to bake of '02/03/01' etc., whereas 2001-02-03 is clearer. You may want to check the ISO 8601 date standard at: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
Good point. Changed to enhancement request.
I think the date format is more consistent now.