I have just freshly installed redhat 7.1 re i386 iso
I've used linux on and off since 91 or 92.
xinetd has a naughty ftpd problem which [is not] yet
in any problem report.
xinetd's man page states, for "/etc/xinetd.d/*",
if disable == yes for a service
that xinetd, when a request for that service on
the port arrives, WILL REFUSE the connection.
HOWEVER - xinetd DOES START ftpd on port 23
despite its flatulent claim!
(no, no ftpd daemon is or was loaded)
I have read the man page. It is wrong: that is
an error that needs attention.
xinetd shouldn't launch services on ports it has
"no configured knowledge of"; as per manpage exposition.
Infact - inetd (Linux NetKit 0.17) has been tried and
xinetd has had at least 5 fixes already. xinetd wasn't
initially linuxconf ready (and so valuable linuxconf
contributor time was spent 'fixing it):
I'm wondering just how xinetd got chosen as a viable
unix base system solution. It just isn't all that:
the author didn't even claim it to be.
Why the name change that breaks scripts (that steer
inetd)? Why change the well known super-server fields
in the config file - which up until now have been similar
Will the linuxconf "fix" that made \[Xi]netd actually work
keep me from using the inetd from:
"Linux NetKit 0.17"
with redhat? If it does - I'm telling! (Or, I'll just not
be as happy as I would normally be.)
Thanks, hope that helps,
John D. Hendrickson
This is like strike six for xinetd, right? How many
strikes does it get anyway?
Is an imperfect kerberos implementation really important?
Kerberos doesn't have three heads -- it has 100
configuration sides. I mean, an NIS+ configured subnet
with stunnel-only connects is good too -- and offers the
same opertunity for password upgrade binges, host-host
tunneling, secure administration, etc...
And anyway? If kerberos is so great, how come they're
"begging" it be exported?
Ok - maybe I'm out of my realm on the encrypted
configurable network point. Still - stunnel is easier
and doesn't require application re-writes for transport
independant (unix) apps, and Kerberos does (kerberiz#q*^&)
Anyway, Have a good one..
ftpd doesn't listen on port 23. Are you sure that's what you're seeing?
Actually, I'm sure he didn't. Also, he claims to have installed RHL 7.1 from
isos - and I now that disable works. This is a bogus report.