Bug 349601 - GFS2 requires straightforward way to determine number of journals
GFS2 requires straightforward way to determine number of journals
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gfs2-utils (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Chris Feist
GFS Bugs
: Documentation
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-10-23 17:18 EDT by Steven J. Levine
Modified: 2010-01-11 22:40 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0350
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-05-21 13:20:18 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to implement gfs2_tool journals (3.46 KB, patch)
2007-10-25 10:49 EDT, Robert Peterson
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Steven J. Levine 2007-10-23 17:18:39 EDT
Description of problem:
With the -T option gone from the gfs2_jadd man page, we have lost the easy
functionality of determining the number of existing journals with an
administrator-level command. To get this info you need to access the gfs2meta
filesystem (which is generally not visible or known to the user), or you need to
run gfs2_edit -p jindex on the file system (which is something of a workaround
and we like to gently shoo people away from the possibly dangerous gfs2_edit

Bob suggested that this could be an option of gfs2_tool.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-10-24 16:34:25 EDT
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
Comment 3 Robert Peterson 2007-10-25 10:47:01 EDT
The gfs2_tool command has a bunch of commands that were commented out
for RHEL5.  That was done mostly because there were numerous ioctls
pulled out of GFS2 in order to satisfy the upstream community.
Most of these, however, have commands in gfs2_edit that do nearly
the same thing.  For example, gfs2_edit -p rindex can be said to replace
gfs2_tool rindex and gfs2_edit -p jindex can be said to replace
gfs2_tool jindex.  However, I won't say that the gfs2_edit command prints
the exact same format as the gfs2_tool.

We should probably open up another bugzilla record so that we can go
through all those commands, evaluate which ones are adequately covered
by gfs2_edit and re-implement the ones that aren't.  That is, if they
can be done without re-implementing new ioctl code in gfs2.
Comment 4 Robert Peterson 2007-10-25 10:49:56 EDT
Created attachment 237381 [details]
Patch to implement gfs2_tool journals

This patch implements gfs2_tool journals <mount point>.
The output looks something like this:

[root@roth-01 ../cluster/gfs2/tool]# ./gfs2_tool journals /mnt/gfs2
journal2 - 128MB
journal1 - 128MB
journal0 - 128MB
3 journals found.
Comment 5 Robert Peterson 2007-10-25 10:52:15 EDT
I'm adding a bunch of gfs2 developers to the cc list so I can get their
input on the format of the new command and its output before committing
(See comment #4).
Comment 6 David Teigland 2007-10-25 11:12:40 EDT
I suggest gfs2_tool df.
Bring back as much of the 'gfs_tool df' output as is reasonable, and then add
new output that seems important, e.g. gfs_tool doesn't show the size of
journals, which is probably something new you want to add in gfs2_tool (and
consider adding the same to gfs_tool also.)
Comment 7 Robert Peterson 2007-10-25 13:41:55 EDT
I think the gfs2_tool df feature is a bit beyond the scope of this bug.
The gfs2_jadd man page was suggesting that users run gfs2_jadd -T
(Test mode) to get the journal information, but I think an option to
gfs2_tool is more appropriate.  However, as I mentioned in comment #3,
it's probably a good idea to evaluate gfs2_tool and get the missing
features, such as df, working.  I just opened bug #352841 for that purpose.
Comment 8 Robert Peterson 2007-10-30 10:09:29 EDT
This was tested on roth-01 and committed to CVS at HEAD and RHEL5
branches for inclusion in 5.2.  Changing status to modified.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 13:20:18 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.