Bug 3504 - fh_verify and nfs_rpc_verify: read-only access on a volume mounted read-write
fh_verify and nfs_rpc_verify: read-only access on a volume mounted read-write
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: knfsd (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
high Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Lawrence
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 1999-06-16 13:03 EDT by o.pribyl
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 1999-07-23 05:16:34 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description o.pribyl 1999-06-16 13:03:44 EDT
I will call the two Red Hat 6.0 machines server and client.
They share password information via NIS.  User john's home
directory is in server:/home/john and server:/home is
exported read-write to the subnet which includes client.
When he logs into client, the home directory is automounted
as client:/homes/john.  All files are accessible, but
whenever john tries to write to the filesystem (creating new
files, deleting, etc), access is denied.  So when he tries
to execute 'touch testfile' in his home directory, the error
message appears on the terminal:
'touch: testfile: Read-only file system' and the file is not

At the same time, kernel on server logs this message to
kernel: fh_verify: john/.bash_history permission failure,
acc=2, error=30

The syslog on client registers:
nfs_rpc_verify: RPC call rejected: 1
nfs_statfs: statfs error = 5

Needless to say, this mounting worked perfectly when both
machines were RedHat 5.2.  The same happens if the server is
Red Hat 6.0 and the client Red Hat 5.2.
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 1999-06-16 13:32:59 EDT
IIRC, the convention for access to a file system has changed. In 5.2,
if no access was specified, rw was assumed. In 6.0, ro is assumed.
Try exporting the file system with explicit rw access.
Comment 2 o.pribyl 1999-06-17 10:57:59 EDT
Your recommendation has done the trick.  I thought I had tried that
when I was submitting the bug report.  I changed the old export entry to and everything
works.  Thanks!
Comment 3 Jeff Johnson 1999-07-23 05:16:59 EDT
This problem appears to be fixed.
Comment 4 Mark Wilkinson 2000-02-25 06:03:59 EST
The documentation is wrong, though. From the exports(5) man page:

       ro     Allow only read-only requests on this  NFS  volume.
              The  default  is  to  allow write requests as well,
              which can also be made explicit  by  using  the  rw

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.