The iprutils source RPM made it into the F8 tree, but the binary package did not make it into the i386 tree -- I haven't checked the others. This is moderately bad, since iprutils is listed as a mandatory package in F8 comps file (both the installed one and the one on the DVD) and the package apparently didn't make it onto the DVD either.
iprutils is ppc hardware specific, in the same way you won't see bootloaders such as yaboot on x86 or grub on ppc/sparc, but they are still mandatory packages
Okay, then why is revisor complaining when I am building for f8-i386? What I'm trying to clarify is: is this a revisor bug, or is it a bug that the package appeared as mandatory in the comps file that shipped for i386? There were some other missing packaged (kdeutils-devel) that clearly *are* bugs. Sorry to have mis-filed. Happy to close and refile in the appropriate place if you can help me figure out where that would be.
I have no idea why those are missing. I would suggest opening a bug against the comps component and going from there.