Bug 378581 - iprutils binary package missing
Summary: iprutils binary package missing
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: iprutils
Version: 8
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Cantrell
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-11-12 19:12 UTC by Jonathan S. Shapiro
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-12 19:32:00 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jonathan S. Shapiro 2007-11-12 19:12:42 UTC
The iprutils source RPM made it into the F8 tree, but the binary package did not
make it into the i386 tree -- I haven't checked the others.

This is moderately bad, since iprutils is listed as a mandatory package in F8
comps file (both the installed one and the one on the DVD) and the package
apparently didn't make it onto the DVD either.

Comment 1 Paul Nasrat 2007-11-12 19:30:33 UTC
iprutils is ppc hardware specific, in the same way you won't see bootloaders
such as yaboot on x86 or grub on ppc/sparc, but they are still mandatory packages

Comment 2 Jonathan S. Shapiro 2007-11-12 20:18:50 UTC
Okay, then why is revisor complaining when I am building for f8-i386?

What I'm trying to clarify is: is this a revisor bug, or is it a bug that the
package appeared as mandatory in the comps file that shipped for i386?

There were some other missing packaged (kdeutils-devel) that clearly *are* bugs.

Sorry to have mis-filed. Happy to close and refile in the appropriate place if
you can help me figure out where that would be.

Comment 3 David Cantrell 2007-11-12 20:35:31 UTC
I have no idea why those are missing.  I would suggest opening a bug against the
comps component and going from there.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.