Bug 383201 - 32-bit pam_winbind.so incompatible with 64-bit winbindd
Summary: 32-bit pam_winbind.so incompatible with 64-bit winbindd
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 356851
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba
Version: 5.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Samba Maint Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-11-14 19:37 UTC by Marcos S. Trazzini
Modified: 2008-01-25 15:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-14 21:20:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 253036 0 high CLOSED 32-bit pam_winbind.so incompatible with 64-bit winbindd 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Description Marcos S. Trazzini 2007-11-14 19:37:17 UTC
Description of problem:

The 32-bit version of pam_winbind.so, needed for 32-bit pam-compatible
applications does not work on a system running a 64-bit winbind daemon. So, I'm
having problems with some 32bit only applications to authenticate.

Exactly the same behavior was previously reported (and fixed) on FC7:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253036

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

samba-3.0.25b-0.el5.4.x86_64
samba-common-3.0.25b-0.el5.4.x86_64
samba-common-3.0.25b-0.el5.4.i386

How reproducible:

Setup a 32-bit, pam-compatible application to use pam_winbind.so on an x86_64
system. It will never successfully authenticate.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install 64-bit samba and samba-common.
2. Setup winbindd to work in a 64-bit environment. Make sure wbinfo works.
3. Install a 32-bit pam-aware app.
4. Install 32-bit samba-common for 32-bit pam_winbind.
5. Configure pam for this 32-bit app to use pam_winbind.
  
Actual results:

The authentication fails.

Expected results:

We expect that the authentication works.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Simo Sorce 2007-11-14 21:20:16 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356851 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.