Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/mythes/mythes-cs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/mythes/mythes-cs-0.20070926-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Czech Thesaurus, splits out the mythes thesaurus from openoffice.org as an independently updateable package
Do you think adding my is ok as I see most of thesaurus packages you submitted have common upstream tarball as thes-<LANGCODE> So just a suggestion is it ok that you use srpm name as "thes-cs"?
oops wrong mouse movement granted review
I preferred mythes-foo because the thesaurus software that reads them is called "mythes" and these thesauri are specifically in that "mythes" format i.e. that of "OpenOffice.org MyThes" http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries I considered packaging the mythes library itself separately to make that explicit point, but it's a tiny messy static library in it's standalone form so it's more trouble than its worth to package in that state.
Packaging looks Ok to me. rpmlint is silent. APPROVED.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-cs Short Description: Czech Thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes
cvs done.
built