Bug 4169 - Previously reported on bug 4149
Summary: Previously reported on bug 4149
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 4082
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: netkit-base   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Lawrence
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-07-22 20:41 UTC by jimbrown
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-07-23 08:09:46 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description jimbrown 1999-07-22 20:41:09 UTC
Here is the transcript of my session notice that I installed
the original rpm ran my test then ran the new rpm and it
failed!

Transcript follows:

[root@jab-linux RPMS]# rpm -U --oldpackage
netkit-base-0.10-29.i386.rpm
[root@jab-linux RPMS]# ls -l /bin/ping
-rwsr-xr-x   1 root     root        14804 Apr  7 17:21
/bin/ping
[root@jab-linux RPMS]# ping -c 1 130.110.238.4
PING 130.110.238.4 (130.110.238.4): 56 data bytes

--- 130.110.238.4 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
[root@jab-linux RPMS]# cd /jbrown/linux/errata
[root@jab-linux errata]# rpm -U netkit-base-0.10-31.i386.rpm
[root@jab-linux errata]# ls -l /biin/ping
ls: /biin/ping: No such file or directory
[root@jab-linux errata]# ls -l /bin/ping
-rwsr-xr-x   1 root     root        17652 Jul  6 09:33
/bin/ping
[root@jab-linux errata]# ping -c 1 130.110.238.4
PING 130.110.238.4 (130.110.238.4) from 130.110.238.80 : 56
data bytes
From jab-linux.isd.ustra.abb.com (130.110.238.80):
Destination Host Unreachable
From jab-linux.isd.ustra.abb.com (130.110.238.80):
Destination Host Unreachable

--- 130.110.238.4 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, +2 errors, 100%
packet loss
[root@jab-linux errata]#

Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 1999-07-23 08:09:59 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4082 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.