Bug 418921 - Review Request: rubygem-activeresource - Active Record for web resources
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeresource - Active Record for web resources
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-12-10 22:02 UTC by David Lutterkort
Modified: 2013-04-30 23:40 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-02 18:55:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
sseago: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description David Lutterkort 2007-12-10 22:02:53 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/rubygem-activeresource.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/rubygem-activeresource-2.0.1-1.src.rpm
Description: 

Wraps web resources in model classes that can be manipulated through XML over
REST.

Comment 1 Scott Seago 2007-12-19 18:37:09 UTC
OK - rpmlint
OK - Package name
OK - License info is accurate
OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
OK - Specfile name
OK - Specfile is legible
OK - No prebuilt binaries included
OK - PreReq not used
OK - Source md5sum matches upstream
OK - No hardcoded pathnames
OK - Package owns all the files it installs
OK - Package requires create needed unowned directories
OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 
OK - BuildRequires sufficient
OK - File permissions set properly (except for rpmlint error below)
OK - Macro usage is consistent
OK - buildroot

OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname}
OK - Source points to full URL of gem
OK - Package version identical with gem version
OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems
OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version
OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly
OK - %prep and %build are empty
OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it
OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir
OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir}
OK - Package is noarch

approved

Comment 2 David Lutterkort 2007-12-19 22:30:32 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-activeresource
Short Description: Active Record for web resources
Owners: lutter
Branches: F-8 devel
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes


Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2007-12-19 22:57:45 UTC
cvs done

Comment 4 David Lutterkort 2007-12-20 17:45:05 UTC
Sorry, forgot F-7

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-activeresource
Short Description: Active Record for web resources
Owners: lutter
Branches: F-7
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2007-12-21 04:36:51 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 6 David Lutterkort 2008-01-02 18:55:32 UTC
Imported and built


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.