Description of problem: I'm running a two cluster system with both nodes RHEL 5.1. I have shared gfs2 filesystems on a SAN storage device. Everything seems to work except for the first time I attempt to run an executable on one of the gfs2 filesystems. The first time I get "permission denied", but all subsequent attempts work as expected. If I unmount and mount the filesystem, again the "permission denied" problem returns just for the first time I try to execute the file. I'm using lock_dlm with 4 journals. I see no message in /var/log/messages corresponding to the "permission denied" problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100%. Steps to Reproduce: See description Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Moving all RHCS ver 5 bugs to RHEL 5 so we can remove RHCS v5 which never existed.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
Created attachment 290955 [details] Proposed patch This is my current patch. Let me know what you think. This is for upstream, and RHEL doesn't need the changes in ops_address.c.
Created attachment 291000 [details] RHEL 5.2 patch Posted to rhkernel-list. (only changes to ops_inode.c from patch in previous comment)
rhkernel-list post: http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhkernel-list/2008-January/msg00257.html
in 2.6.18-71.el5 You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0314.html