Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 426032

Summary: HWCERT: Altix 350
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Ready Certification Tests Reporter: Jerry Wei <wei>
Component: dumpsterAssignee: Xu Bo <bxu>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: John Flanagan <flanagan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0CC: ctatman, rsanders
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: ia64   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.sgi.com/products/servers/altix/350/
Whiteboard: Altix
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 19:43:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
SGI Altix 350 32P/128G test results none

Description Jerry Wei 2007-12-17 21:35:09 UTC
Red Hat Hardware Certification Submitted

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Version:	5
Make:		Altix
Model:		350
Vendor: 	SGI
Category:	Server
Reporter:	wei

Created an attachment (id=289817)
hts-SGI-350-Tikanga5_ia64_results-1.noarch.rpm 

Kernel Version: kernel-2.6.18-8.el5

Please note the following failures:
FAILED: Incorrect memory amount

Results:
-----------------

0   PASSED   INFO
    PASSED   MEMORY
    PASSED   CORE


Comment 1 Jerry Wei 2007-12-17 21:37:37 UTC
This results should be attached to BZ234910 for RHEL5 certification of SGI Altix
350.  The supported maximum memory for Altix 250 is 128G now.

Comment 2 Xu Bo 2007-12-18 02:08:10 UTC
Jerry,
>>This results should be attached to BZ234910 for RHEL5 certification of SGI
>>Altix 350. The supported maximum memory for Altix 250 is 128G now.

Is this cert against "Altix 250"? A typo?

As per the specs, the box supports up to 384 GB memory. Bus seems you said the
maximum memory is 128 GB. which one is correct?

Another thing I need your help: Would you please upload the test results on the
original bug#234910? I have re-opened it. But I can't migrate the RPM you
uploaded in this bug to the original cert as the catalog refuses to upload the
duplicate RPM. So would you please run the tests including the MEMORY during you
test other devices and upload it to bug#234910. I think we can keep the original
cert opening and close this one to dumpster.

Thanks a lot :)
/Xu

Comment 3 Xu Bo 2007-12-25 03:09:03 UTC
Jerry,
>>This results should be attached to BZ234910 for RHEL5 certification of SGI
>>Altix 350. The supported maximum memory for Altix 250 is 128G now.

Is this cert against "Altix 250"? A typo?

As per the specs, the box supports up to 384 GB memory. Bus seems you said the
maximum memory is 128 GB. which one is correct?

Another thing I need your help: Would you please upload the test results on the
original bug#234910? I have re-opened it. But I can't migrate the RPM you
uploaded in this bug to the original cert as the catalog refuses to upload the
duplicate RPM. So would you please run the tests including the MEMORY during you
test other devices and upload it to bug#234910. I think we can keep the original
cert opening and close this one to dumpster.

Thanks a lot :)
/Xu

Comment 4 Xu Bo 2007-12-29 05:30:06 UTC
Jerry,
>>This results should be attached to BZ234910 for RHEL5 certification of SGI
>>Altix 350. The supported maximum memory for Altix 250 is 128G now.

Is this cert against "Altix 250"? A typo?

As per the specs, the box supports up to 384 GB memory. Bus seems you said the
maximum memory is 128 GB. which one is correct?

Another thing I need your help: Would you please upload the test results on the
original bug#234910? I have re-opened it. But I can't migrate the RPM you
uploaded in this bug to the original cert as the catalog refuses to upload the
duplicate RPM. So would you please run the tests including the MEMORY during you
test other devices and upload it to bug#234910. I think we can keep the original
cert opening and close this one to dumpster.

Thanks a lot :)
/Xu

Comment 5 Xu Bo 2008-01-02 01:32:17 UTC
Jerry, happy new year :)

I think this cert is identical as bug#234910. I am going to close this one to
dumpster. Please get the test results uploaded in bug#234910.

Thanks,
/Xu