Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 426350
Review Request: mono-basic
Last modified: 2008-02-01 02:32:22 EST
Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-basic.spec
SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-basic-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: mono-basic is the visual basic compiler for mono
I'll take this as a bribe for fixing #394851.
builds cleanly in mock (tested x86_64 Rawhide and i386 F8)
Owns all it's file and directories
the spec is in clean US English (and nifty sed magic)
GPL/LGPL are no longer valid licenses
Summary needs to be capitalized (minor but rpmlint complains so let's shut it up)
mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 7)
Aside that, the spec seems to comply to packaging standards. Is there any reason to export the
Fixed the bad bits and removed the export language bit (it was from another spec
This seems sane to me.. APPROVED.
Shouldn't the license be LGPLv2+?
I'm not sure.
This URL suggests GPLv2 : http://www.t2-project.org/packages/mono-basic.html, as
However, I've seen it also listed as LGPL.
I'll see what upstream has to say.
there is no CVS request here. please follow the directions at
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: mono-basic
Short Description: VB.NET support for mono
Branches: FC7, FC8
Cvsextras Commits: yes
This is in the repos now, CLOSING