Bug 427226 - Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor
Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-01-02 12:26 UTC by Adel Gadllah
Modified: 2008-01-04 19:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-04 19:59:40 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
panemade: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adel Gadllah 2008-01-02 12:26:38 UTC
Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec
SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: 
Bless is a binary (hex) editor, a program that 
enables you to edit files as sequences of bytes.

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-01-02 12:33:11 UTC
will review this.

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-01-03 04:35:26 UTC
Just want to know why this patch is needed bless-0.5.2-buildfix.patch ?

rpmlint is not happy with messages
bless.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
bless.src:66: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bless/

other rpmlint message is ok as per mono packaging guidelines.
bless.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib


Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-01-03 04:43:27 UTC
use scrollkeeper scriptlet as given at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets

Comment 4 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-03 11:29:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Just want to know why this patch is needed bless-0.5.2-buildfix.patch ?

Because the data in the po directory breaks the build and there aren't any
translations included anyway (in the tarball).

> rpmlint is not happy with messages
> bless.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
> bless.src:66: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bless/

I know but I had to do this because using libdir would result in either
/usr/lib64/ or /usr/lib/ depending on the build host. And since this is a noarch
package it has to use /usr/lib.

> other rpmlint message is ok as per mono packaging guidelines.
> bless.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

ok.


Comment 6 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-03 11:41:04 UTC
"We use %{_libdir} because we do not consider mono packages to be noarch." 
So I changed it to not be noarch.

http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec
http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-3.fc8.src.rpm

Comment 7 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-01-04 04:43:33 UTC
I think you also need to add
ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha
as BR's of this package includes them.
Build failed on koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=323749&name=root.log

Comment 9 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-01-04 14:16:04 UTC
SHOULD:
  follow use scrollkeeper scriptlet as given at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets with proper post and
postun requires.
   As per given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono
We use %{_libdir} because we do not consider mono packages to be noarch. 
 Follow mono packaging guidelines.

Comment 10 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-04 14:25:56 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> SHOULD:
>   follow use scrollkeeper scriptlet as given at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets with proper post and
> postun requires.

Fixed.

>    As per given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono
> We use %{_libdir} because we do not consider mono packages to be noarch. 
>  Follow mono packaging guidelines.

Already fixed this see comment 6 ;)

New SPEC and SRPM:
http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec
http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-5.fc8.src.rpm




Comment 11 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-01-04 14:43:14 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM But Silent for SRPM.
bless.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
bless.i386: E: no-binary
==> This is ok as per mono packaging guidelines.
+ source files match upstream.
2f395e0b0c82382c49864947aea894ca  bless-0.5.2.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present in separate -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags are honored correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Desktop files handled correctly.
+ scrollkeeper scriptlets are used.
+GUI app.

APPROVED.


Comment 12 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-04 15:15:21 UTC
(In reply to comment #11)
>
> APPROVED.
>

thx for the review.

================ 

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: bless
Short Description: High quality, full featured hex editor
Owners: drago01
Branches: F-7 F-8
Cvsextras Commits: yes



Comment 13 Kevin Fenzi 2008-01-04 18:54:31 UTC
cvs done.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.