Bug 427391 - Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility
Summary: Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Alexandre Salim
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 427411
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-01-03 17:26 UTC by Anthony Green
Modified: 2015-02-13 18:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-13 14:53:40 UTC
michel: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Anthony Green 2008-01-03 17:26:09 UTC
Spec URL: http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/cl-asdf.spec
SRPM URL: cl-asdf-20071110-3.fc8.src.rpm
Description: 
Another System Definition Facility (asdf) is a package format for
Common Lisp libraries.

This package is a prerequisite for this feature proposal:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CommonLispController

Comment 1 Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-05-29 02:00:24 UTC
SRPM link broken, by the way; had to cut-and-paste to combine with spec URL.
Does the source not have any upstream URL we can link to?


Comment 2 Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-05-29 02:07:00 UTC
Ignore previous question; upstream policy is still to release using CVS. Perhaps
put a comment above the Source line? (though I guess one can infer the lack of
tarballs from the versioning scheme).

One more question -- presumably installing this does not conflict with SBCL's
own bundled copy of ASDF?


Comment 3 Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-05-29 02:19:16 UTC
+1 Approved.

MUST

• rpmlint: OK
• package name: OK
• spec file name: OK
• package guideline-compliant: OK
• license complies with guidelines: OK
• license field accurate: OK
• license file not deleted: OK
• spec in US English: OK
• spec legible: OK
• source matches upstream: OK
• builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: noarch: OK
• build dependencies complete: trivially OK (none)
• own all directories: OK
• no dupes in %files: OK
• permission: OK
• %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK
• macros used consistently: OK
• Package contains code: OK
• clean buildroot before install: OK
• filenames UTF-8: OK

SHOULD
• package build in mock on all architectures: OK
• package functioned as described: suggestion on how to test?
• scriplets are sane: OK


Comment 4 Anthony Green 2008-07-06 13:44:15 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: cl-asdf
Short Description: Another System Definition Facility
Owners: green
Branches: devel
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: yes


Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2008-07-07 02:07:20 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 6 Anthony Green 2010-11-12 21:55:23 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: cl-asdf
New Branches: el6
Owners: green
InitialCC: rdieter

I'd like to bring this package into el6 for common-lisp-controller.

Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-13 16:47:53 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 8 Rex Dieter 2015-02-13 18:19:21 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: common-lisp-controller
New Branches: epel7
Owners: green
InitialCC: rdieter

Comment 9 Rex Dieter 2015-02-13 18:19:40 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: cl-asdf
New Branches: epel7
Owners: green
InitialCC: rdieter

Comment 10 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-02-13 18:21:29 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.