rpmlint complains:
  hunspell-ne.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL
A version is mandatory these days.  I can't see one indicated anywhere in this
package, though, and I'm not sure it's safe to just assume LGPLv2+.

* source files match upstream:
   b19a287970de63d246b4710f15ff6a039527a394e88b17be1d0ffc90753ece72  
   ne_NP_dict.zip
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
X rpmlint has a valid complaint
* final provides and requires are sane:
   hunspell-ne = 20061217-1.fc9
  =
   hunspell
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* acceptable content
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

tibbs,
  I contacted upstream author and he gave me following link where its clearly
mentioned that license is LGPL2.1
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70512

Updated links
Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ne.spec
SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ne-20061217-2.fc8.src.rpm

It would be nice if that made it into the upstream tarball, but I don't see why
it should hold up this package.

APPROVED

Thanks for review. Will request upstream to release new source package which
includes license version.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: hunspell-ne
Short Description: Nepali hunspell dictionaries
Owners: pnemade
Branches: F-8
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

cvs admin done

Thanks Jens.
Built for all requested branches.