Bug 428332 - Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events
Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: manuel wolfshant
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2008-01-10 21:25 UTC by Patrice Dumas
Modified: 2008-12-14 05:42 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 0.0.7-1.fc8
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-02-28 21:36:29 UTC
Type: ---
wolfy: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Patrice Dumas 2008-01-10 21:25:49 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/halevt.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpm/halevt-0.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm
Halevt (HAL events manager) is a daemon that executes arbitrary commands 
when a device with certain properties is added to the system and when 
device properties change. Halevt uses HAL to monitor the state of your 
system's hardware. With the default config file, it can handle 
the mounting of media as they are inserted/attached to the system.

Halevt comes with halevt-mount a program able to use HAL to mount, umount 
devices and keep a list of devices handled by halevt-mount.

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2008-01-10 21:26:32 UTC
I am upstream, so I would have preferred not to be the maintainer,
but since nobody submit it...

Comment 2 manuel wolfshant 2008-01-10 23:59:29 UTC
There is a typo in the src.rpm link above (fc-srpm instead of fc-srpms)...

Package Review

 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on:devel/x86_64
 [x] Rpmlint output:
Source RPM: no output
Binary halevt:
        halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/run/halevt halevt
        halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /var/run/halevt halevt
        halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/halevt 0750
        halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/halevt halevt
        halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/halevt halevt
--> all are normal given that it runs under its own user + security restrictions
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in
 the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type:GPLv2+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, co
ntaining the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
     SHA1SUM of package: a51618512edaa8dd1e3cf347c6376c5ddbda86e6
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions sectio
n of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: devel/x86_64
 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     Tested on:
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [x] File based requires are sane.

  I wonder if the file named ChangeLog should not be packaged, too ? I'll trust
your judgement, since you are also upstream.
  I'll try to test the program tomorrow and come back with the rest of the review.

Comment 3 manuel wolfshant 2008-01-11 13:01:50 UTC
I've given a try today. It seems to work, my var/log/messages is full of stuff
generated by halevt.


Comment 4 Patrice Dumas 2008-01-11 13:20:38 UTC
Manuel, thanks for the quick review.

Filling /var/log/messages is not necessarily the proof of a great 
software, but currently it is on purpose because there hasn't been a 
lot of testing and these messages also help to understand what event
halevt sees. Maybe I'll try to do a less verbose release or have 
a configurable verbosity someday.

As for the ChangeLog, I try to have everything relevant for users in
NEWS, ChangeLog is for developers only.

New Package CVS Request
Package Name: halevt
Short Description: Generic handler for HAL events
Owners: pertusus
Branches: F-8
Cvsextras Commits: yes

Comment 5 Patrice Dumas 2008-01-11 13:21:31 UTC
I can make a F-7 branch if somebody asks for it, but given
that I had to submit it I guess that nobody will.

Comment 6 manuel wolfshant 2008-01-11 13:29:54 UTC
FWIW: My testing was performed on a F-7

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2008-01-11 22:02:06 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 8 manuel wolfshant 2008-01-14 17:49:13 UTC
The package seems to have been built sucessfully and pushed (at least in
rawhide). Any reason to not close this bug ?

Comment 9 Patrice Dumas 2008-01-14 19:31:41 UTC
No reason, closing.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2008-01-15 22:59:02 UTC
halevt-0.0.7-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update halevt'

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2008-02-28 21:36:26 UTC
halevt-0.0.7-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Patrice Dumas 2008-12-12 15:19:20 UTC
Package Change Request
Package Name: halevt
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: pertusus

Comment 13 Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 05:42:43 UTC
cvs done.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.