Bug 430072 - xdg-open should call mimeopen with -L option
Summary: xdg-open should call mimeopen with -L option
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xdg-utils
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rex Dieter
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-01-24 12:25 UTC by Miroslav Lichvar
Modified: 2012-01-04 08:31 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc12
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-13 20:44:02 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miroslav Lichvar 2008-01-24 12:25:46 UTC
Description of problem:
It would be nice to call mimeopen with -L option in xdg-open to follow symlinks.
I noticed this when trying to view an attachment in mutt while composing new
email, mutt created a symlink for the attachment.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xdg-utils-1.0.2-3

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2008-01-24 13:55:35 UTC
I'm surprised following symlinks isn't the default mimeopen behavior.  ??

Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2008-01-24 22:31:11 UTC
Yeah, me too. I'll ask upstream.

Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2008-02-25 12:55:25 UTC
Patrice, any word from mimeopen upstream regarding -L, following symlink behavior?

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2008-02-25 12:58:14 UTC
Reassigning (for now).

Comment 5 Patrice Dumas 2008-05-03 14:10:30 UTC
I have asked upstream some time ago, but didn't got any response.
I'll certainly retry after my vacations if I don't forget.

Comment 6 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 04:52:09 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 7 Rex Dieter 2008-08-04 15:18:19 UTC
Patrice, ping?  any news movement on mimeopen -L usage/default?

Comment 8 Patrice Dumas 2008-08-04 15:48:19 UTC
I think I forgot to reask. I'll dot it soon.

Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 23:25:42 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 9.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '9'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 10 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 08:00:41 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 11 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2010-03-02 18:01:03 UTC
Reassigning to new package owner

Comment 12 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-03-03 06:10:47 UTC
Switching back, I'm not maintainer.

Comment 13 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2010-03-03 06:13:49 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 14 Petr Pisar 2010-06-22 10:47:01 UTC
mimeopen (from perl-File-MimeInfo package) does not use xdg-open (from xdg-utils). The no-follow behavior is default for mimeopen.

However I opened feature request <https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=58575> at upstream.

If xdg-open users want consistent behavior over all xdg-utils back-ends, xdg-open code must be changed to reflect it:

$ grep -Hn -C5 mimeopen /usr/bin/xdg-open 
/usr/bin/xdg-open-426-            if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
/usr/bin/xdg-open-427-                exit_success
/usr/bin/xdg-open-428-            fi
/usr/bin/xdg-open-429-        fi
/usr/bin/xdg-open-430-
/usr/bin/xdg-open:431:        if mimeopen -v 2>/dev/null 1>&2; then
/usr/bin/xdg-open:432:            mimeopen -n "$file"
/usr/bin/xdg-open-433-            if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
/usr/bin/xdg-open-434-                exit_success
/usr/bin/xdg-open-435-            fi
/usr/bin/xdg-open-436-        fi
/usr/bin/xdg-open-437-    fi

Add `-L' option on line 431.

Reassigning to xdg-utils.

Comment 15 Rex Dieter 2010-06-23 12:19:51 UTC
You agree mimeopen behavior is inconsistent, yet you insist that xdg-open be patched instead of mimeopen?

Comment 16 Rex Dieter 2010-06-23 12:20:52 UTC
rebasing, +FutureFeature keyword so this doesn't get eol'd prior to resolution

Comment 17 Petr Pisar 2010-06-23 13:34:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #15)
> You agree mimeopen behavior is inconsistent, yet you insist that xdg-open be
> patched instead of mimeopen?    

Exactly. The problem is xdg-open does not respect interface defined by underlying mimeopen (even if it is stupid). Thus it's a bug in xdg-open and xdg-open should be changed to resolve this bug report.

I cannot change mimeopen API because it would: divert from upstream and break third-party applications.

Comment 18 Rex Dieter 2010-07-09 13:42:51 UTC
Alright, change pushed upstream, will be included in the next pkg update.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2010-07-09 16:23:55 UTC
xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc13

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2010-07-09 16:46:18 UTC
xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc12

Comment 21 Fedora Update System 2010-07-13 07:25:20 UTC
xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xdg-utils'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc12

Comment 22 Fedora Update System 2010-07-13 07:33:21 UTC
xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xdg-utils'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc13

Comment 23 Fedora Update System 2010-07-13 20:43:52 UTC
xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 24 Fedora Update System 2010-11-10 01:09:20 UTC
xdg-utils-1.0.2-20.20100709.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 25 Petr Pisar 2012-01-04 08:31:38 UTC
perl-File-MimeInfo upstream has decided to follow symlinks by default since version 0.16.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.