+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #123768 +++ Description of problem: See http://canuck.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2004-May/009761.html. Click on the first link -- the mailto: link. Or allow the mouse to hover over it in your browser or do whatever else you do to see the link target. It's as follows: mailto:linux-mtd%40lists.infradead.org?Subject=Administivia%20--%20mailing%20list%20server%20changes.&In-Reply-To= However, the In-Reply-To: header _should_ have contained the Message-ID of the mail to which you'd be replying. If you look at the mbox archive at http://canuck.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2004-May.txt it's clear that the Message-ID is preserved by the archival process. It seems to be the code which generates the HTML in the archive which is at fault. This breaks threading when using the web archive to reply to the list. Actually, the Subject line should probably also have 'Re: ' prepended in the mailto: link too, if the subject doesn't already start with 'Re: '. This is mailman-2.1.4-4 -- Additional comment from mattdm on 2005-04-26 12:03 EST -- Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or in the FC4 test release, reopen and change the version to match. -- Additional comment from dwmw2 on 2006-10-05 05:11 EST -- I had a fix for this once; I thought I'd sent it to the mailman folks. I'll try to dig it out. -- Additional comment from dwmw2 on 2006-10-05 05:23 EST -- Created an attachment (id=137808) Fix -- Additional comment from dwmw2 on 2006-10-05 06:23 EST -- Patch applied to FC-[45] and devel branches. Do we need to do anything special for RHEL5 or will it inherit from devel? -- Additional comment from tsmetana on 2007-05-09 09:54 EST -- Fix is present also in RHEL-5.
Apparently this fix didn't make it to RHEL-5 from Fedora. I see no reason not to attach it to the currently processed bugs -- the patch was committed a long time ago and is present in Fedora.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0416.html