Bug 431703 - Upgrade to texlive on FC8 gives 2500 ambiguous font warnings
Summary: Upgrade to texlive on FC8 gives 2500 ambiguous font warnings
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: texlive-texmf
Version: 8
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-02-06 16:19 UTC by Steven Waslander
Modified: 2013-07-02 23:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-04 20:24:31 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Steven Waslander 2008-02-06 16:19:39 UTC
Description of problem:  I just upgraded from tetex to texlive on Fedora 8, and
I still get the 2500 ambiguous font warnings when using pdftex.  This makes Kile
and texmaker extremely slow to use.  I added the texlive repo, then did a yum
update.  It seems this issue was resolved, but not for me!

The warnings all look like:

pdfTeX warning: pdflatex (file /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.ma
p): ambiguous entry for `tosl7': font file present but not included, will be tr
eated as font file not present


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:  I then removed all texlive packages and reinstalled.  The
problem remains.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Follow upgrade instructions for texlive (add repo, yum update) with FC8 and
tetex installed
2. Compile a tex document with pdftex

  
Actual results: Compiles the tex document, but generates 2500 ambiguous font
warnings like 



Expected results:  Compiles the tex document cleanly without warnings 


Additional info:  Trying to roll back to tetex also didn't work, as there were
three dependencies that could not be resolved.

Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2008-03-04 20:24:31 UTC
This is fixed in rawhide and I'm also uploading new F8 rpms to the texlive
repository.

The problem was invalid references to cm-super fonts that are not packaged in
the texlive rpms.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.