Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0-1jpp.noarch/swing-layout-1.0-1jpp.src.rpm mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0-1jpp.noarch/ Description: Natural layout for Swing panels Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. This project has an eye towards the needs of GUI builders, such as NetBeans. This project consists of the following pieces: * Ability to get the baseline for components. * Ability to get the preferred gap between components. A new LayoutManager that utilizes both of these concepts and is tuned toward a free-form drag and drop layout model as can be provided by GUI builders. Note: This is a raw import from JPackage 1.6 and thus most likely not yet complete. This reports exists to keep track of the packaging progress and to simplify cooperation on packaging. Comments from experienced Java packagers are very welcome.
swing-layout.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. This project has an eye towards the needs of GUI builders, such as NetBeans. This project consists of the following pieces: swing-layout.noarch: E: description-line-too-long A new LayoutManager that utilizes both of these concepts and is tuned toward a free-form drag and drop layout model as can be provided by GUI builders. swing-layout.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java swing-layout.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:0.9-1jpp 0:1.0-1jpp swing-layout.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL swing-layout.noarch: W: empty-%pre swing-layout.noarch: W: empty-%postun swing-layout.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 48) swing-layout.src: E: description-line-too-long Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. This project has an eye towards the needs of GUI builders, such as NetBeans. This project consists of the following pieces: swing-layout.src: E: description-line-too-long A new LayoutManager that utilizes both of these concepts and is tuned toward a free-form drag and drop layout model as can be provided by GUI builders. swing-layout.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java swing-layout.src: W: invalid-license LGPL swing-layout.src: W: strange-permission swing-layout-1.0-src.zip 0600 swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
Builds fine in mock.
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.noarch/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.src.rpm mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.noarch/
[+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [+] dist tag is present [+] build root is correct [+] license is open source-compatible [+] %clean is present [+] package builds in mock (dist-f8) [+] package installs properly [+] rpmlint is sane All others issue are resolved.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: swing-layout Short Description: Natural layout for Swing panels Owners: lkundrak Branches: (none, just devel needed) Cvsextras Commits: yes
Umm, I think this is quite a bit premature. We don't yet have java guidelines, and, for example, the javadoc scriptlets that this package uses really should not be there.
Jason: Not having java guidelines does mean there are no limitations specific to java, so general guidelines apply. Once we have java guidelines this might or might not comply. In that case it, and not only it will have to be reviewed and fixed co comply. And when it comes to those scriptlets, I did not like them and so didn't Marek, but I assumed they have some reason for existance as they're found in many jpackage packages. I'd be happy to remove them when importing the package.
> Jason: Not having java guidelines does mean there are no limitations specific > to java, so general guidelines apply. Actually not. Look at all of the other Java packages blocking F-GUIDELINES. I just didn't have a chance to get to this one. We have quite a history of blocking packages on the ratification of guidelines. See PHP (PEAR and PECL packages), Haskell, Ocaml, etc.
I'm clearing the flags here and setting the FE_GUIDELINES blocker. Please help make sure there are java guidelines before reviewing this...
Marek: Can you please re-check this package against the now approved Java guidelines and re-approve it if all is well?
Kevin, worked with Lubomir on last details. I see no other issues (except the distag, Lubomir is fixing it).
ok, cvs done. I assume the javadoc scriptlets mentioned in comment #6 will be removed before import?
Kevin: sure. done; thank you for CVS. Marek, much thanks for review!
*** Bug 439262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: swing-layout Branches: EL-6
cvs done.