Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 434089
pekwm failed massrebuild attempt for GCC 4.3
Last modified: 2013-01-09 21:53:14 EST
This is an automatically filed bug for a failed rebuild attempt for GCC 4.3. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/gcc43MassRebuildProposal Please verify why this build failed and fix it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=438712 Exit code was 1, check the build.log for the failed buildArch task.
In file included from ColorHandler.cc:8: ColorHandler.hh: In member function 'bool ColorHandler::Entry::operator==(const std::string&)': ColorHandler.hh:33: error: 'strcasecmp' was not declared in this scope ColorHandler.cc: In member function 'XColor* ColorHandler::getColor(const std::string&)': ColorHandler.cc:56: error: 'strcasecmp' was not declared in this scope In file included from CfgParserSource.cc:14: Util.hh: In function 'bool Util::isTrue(const std::string&)': Util.hh:51: error: 'strncasecmp' was not declared in this scope CfgParserSource.cc: In member function 'virtual bool CfgParserSourceCommand::open()': CfgParserSource.cc:102: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [ColorHandler.o] Error 1
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
*** Bug 440883 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This package has Failed to Build From Source for many months. Per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS, this package is now proposed for removal from the distribution. Please address this FTBFS bug immediately, or this package will be removed from the distribution within the next few weeks. Thank you for your continued contributions to Fedora, and your commitment to ensuring Fedora packages remain buildable from source code.
We can go 2 ways with this. 0.1.5 + fixes for the gcc 4.3 compile errors or 0.1.7 which already compiles cleanly with gcc 4.3, but then someone needs to re-evaluate the Fedora-specific patches being applied in the spec file, in particular, the menu changes. If those menu changes aren't critical, I'd say drop them and move on to 0.1.7. Michael Rice - what say you as package owner?
I went ahead and did the 0.1.5 + gcc 4.3 fixes, and am building it for rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=830427 But I'll leave this open, as I think it makes sense to upgrade to 0.1.7, but need the owner to do so, or to release ownership so another loving packager can take it on.
Closing this one, now that I cloned the upgrade for to 0.1.7 into it's own RFE bug.