Bug 434566 – OpenOffice.org Java dependencies are Incorrect

Bug 434566 - OpenOffice.org Java dependencies are Incorrect

Summary:	OpenOffice.org Java dependencies are Incorrect

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	openoffice.org (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	8
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Caolan McNamara
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2008-02-22 14:55 EST by TR Bentley
Modified:	2008-02-22 15:08 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-02-22 15:08:43 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description TR Bentley 2008-02-22 14:55:19 EST

Description of problem:
OpenOffice Java dependencies are not correct. Why should OpenOffice a
wordprocessor have java dependencies with Tomcat, Eclipse and other Server based
java packages.  OpenOffice should only be dependent on the JDK.
Some how by breaking the packages up small (BSF and BSH?) cyclic dependencies
were introduced. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install Open Office 
2.Install Tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api
3.Remove Tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api and OpenOffice uninstalls
  
Actual results:


Expected results:
OpenOffice should not need Tomcat5 etc installed on a desktop.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2008-02-22 15:08:43 EST

OpenOffice.org's java dependencies are not incorrect. OOo requires bsh, that's
correct.

bsh them itself requires bsf
and bsf then itself requires tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api

if you want to take it up with the maintainers of bsh, bsf to see if their
dependencies are correct/incorrect then go ahead, but the require on bsh is correct

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.