Description of problem: At the end of what looks like normal processing, I see this: sh: xdvipdfmx: command not found no output file is produced. But at the end it says 'output written to test.pdf', which is a lie. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Are you sure you have dvipdfmx package installed? texlive-xetex should have required it.
btw. dvipdfmx is now to be packaged separately. Please have a look at bug #433225 for more information.
xdvipdfmx is not the same as dvipdfmx. I put a version here: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/xdvipdfmx-0.3-1.src.rpm
Thanks for packaging xdvipdfmx! Before you file a review request a few points: xdvipdfmx.src: E: invalid-spec-name xdvipdfmx-0.3.spec Please do not version the spec file, name it simply xdvipdfmx.spec xdvipdfmx.src:14: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Jonathan AFAIK this tag became obsolete xdvipdfmx.src:36: W: setup-not-quiet Please use %setup -q to calm down verbose setup xdvipdfmx.src:43: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT This belongs to %install phase. xdvipdfmx.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install As the above. xdvipdfmx.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean xdvipdfmx.src: W: no-%clean-section Here also has to be rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %clean section that has to exist. xdvipdfmx.src: W: non-standard-group Productivity/Publishing/TeX/Base Please use Applications/Publishing here instead. xdvipdfmx.src: W: invalid-license GPL Valid license tag seems to be GPLv2+ xdvipdfmx.src: W: strange-permission xdvipdfmx-0.3.spec 0600 Better to have 0664 here.
I have an updated version: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/xdvipdfmx-0.4-1.src.rpm I'm stuck on 1 thing: xdvipdfmx.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng I have no idea what's causing this. It looks to me that other libs (e.g., zlib) are used exactly the same way as libpng. Is it just because the requires is called 'lib<something>'? That's the package that provides it: rpm -q --whatprovides libpng libpng-1.2.22-1.fc8.x86_64 libpng-1.2.22-1.fc8.i386
RPM will add the requires automatically via the find-requires script after build that analyzes every executable in buildroot and add needed Requires. So you don't need to specify neither libpng nor libz Requires but rather BuildRequire them.
If you want to include xdvipdfmx to Fedora, please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess There is needed a review request bug, where we can go on with the review.
I think xelatex works fine with the latest texlive. If not, please reopen.