Bug 436809 - Rawhide .treeinfo files in install tree are missing boot ISO entry
Rawhide .treeinfo files in install tree are missing boot ISO entry
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Anaconda Maintenance Team
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-03-10 11:56 EDT by Daniel Berrange
Modified: 2013-01-09 23:35 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-06-21 16:16:16 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Daniel Berrange 2008-03-10 11:56:15 EDT
Description of problem:
In Fedora 8 there were entries in the .treeinfo file for the bootable ISOs


In Fedora 9 rawhide, these entries are missing


This is probably the result of boot.iso / diskboot.iso being renamed/merged into

The virt-install/virt-manager tools use the tree info file to locate available
ISO images for installing fullyvirt guests, so I'd like to get the ISO entries
re-added to rawhide's .treeinfo.

Preferrably with the entry key named 'boot.iso', even if the resulting value is
still called 'netinst.iso'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Rawhide tree on March 10, 2008

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open .treeinfo file
2. Look at [images-i386]  section
Actual results:
No ISO images listed

Expected results:
Entry for 'boot.iso'

Additional info:
Unclear whether 'pungi' is the best place to enter bugs about the composed trees
or not - feel free to move to different product/component if there's a better one
Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2008-03-10 12:31:24 EDT
Turns out, this is buildinstall.
Comment 2 Jesse Keating 2008-03-10 12:46:40 EDT
I'm getting very lost reading the scripts trying to find when netinst.iso is
actually written.  Leaving it up to Jeremy.
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2008-03-10 13:42:37 EDT
Added back, although the format of the file makes it so you could conceivably
get the iso listed even if it wasn't built.  
Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 01:54:23 EDT
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.