Bug 436861 - x86_64: 2.6.24.3-12.fc8: I/O-port access SIGSEGV
x86_64: 2.6.24.3-12.fc8: I/O-port access SIGSEGV
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
8
x86_64 Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Kernel Maintainer List
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-03-10 16:00 EDT by Jan Kratochvil
Modified: 2008-03-13 03:34 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.24.3-22.fc8.x86_64
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-13 03:34:06 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Testcase (463 bytes, text/plain)
2008-03-10 16:00 EDT, Jan Kratochvil
no flags Details
The real testcase. (275 bytes, text/plain)
2008-03-10 16:04 EDT, Jan Kratochvil
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Jan Kratochvil 2008-03-10 16:00:08 EDT
Description of problem:
irda-utils findchip segfaults because `outb' segfaults despite previous
successful ioperm(2).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8.x86_64 (F8, broken)
but it work on: kernel-2.6.25-0.101.rc4.git3.fc9.x86_64 (Rawhide)

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. gcc -o outport outport.c -Wall -ggdb2

Actual results:
Segmentation fault

Expected results:
PASS

Additional info:
strace ./outport
...
ioperm(0x3f0, 0x1, 0x1)                 = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++

# gdb ./outport
...
(gdb) r
Starting program: /tmp/outport 

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000040059b in main () at outport.c:14
14        __asm__ __volatile__ ("outb %b0,%w1": :"a" (value), "Nd" (port));
(gdb) x/i $rip
0x40059b <main+83>:     out    %al,(%dx)
(gdb) p/x $rdx
$1 = 0x3f0
(gdb)
Comment 1 Jan Kratochvil 2008-03-10 16:00:08 EDT
Created attachment 297504 [details]
Testcase
Comment 2 Jan Kratochvil 2008-03-10 16:04:53 EDT
Created attachment 297505 [details]
The real testcase.

The previous testcase was an unrelated code - a filename typo.
Comment 3 Chuck Ebbert 2008-03-12 18:53:34 EDT
I get PASS on 2.6.24.3-22.fc8.x86_64, with an AMD processor.
Comment 4 Jan Kratochvil 2008-03-13 03:34:06 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> I get PASS on 2.6.24.3-22.fc8.x86_64, with an AMD processor.

So it is probably fixed. (this is Intel T7200)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.