Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 436908
/etc/sgml/catalog includes a wrong line
Last modified: 2008-03-11 05:09:10 EDT
Description of problem: The first line of /etc/sgml/catalog is: CATALOG "/etc/sgml/openjade-1.3.2-30.fc8.soc" Since that file does not exist, I cannot build packages which uses that catalog file during building. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download and rebuild: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13-1.f8.src.rpm 2. Package will not build with these errors: openjade:/etc/sgml/catalog:1:8:E: cannot open "/etc/sgml/openjade-1.3.2-30.fc8.soc" (No such file or directory) The fix is attached. Regards, Devrim
Created attachment 297557 [details] Patch for /etc/catalog/sgml
Thanks for report, but this is quiet strange thing. Registration to the catalog is done by spec file ( by following sequence %post /sbin/ldconfig /usr/bin/install-catalog --add /etc/sgml/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.soc \ %{_datadir}/sgml/%{name}-%{version}/catalog >/dev/null 2>/dev/null || : %preun /usr/bin/install-catalog --remove /etc/sgml/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.soc \ %{_datadir}/sgml/%{name}-%{version}/catalog >/dev/null 2>/dev/null || : ) So something went wrong during your upgrade to fedora 9 openjade package. Could you please provide following informations? 1)rpm -q openjade 2)rpm -V openjade 3)rpm -q sgml-common 4)rpm -V sgml-common 5)rpm -qf /usr/bin/install-catalog It looks like that during your upgrade there was no/modified sgml-common package (which provides /usr/bin/install-catalog) and registration of new package was not correct - or something else went wrong. I tried the upgrade on my machine and it works without troubles.
Btw. your patch is hardcoded for that one specific version and release, so in any case I could not use it - /etc/sgml/catalog file is not owned by openjade package. On my machine the upgrade works , so I would say this is most probably something system specific or very rare. But it should be clarified before fixing it or closing notabug.
Platform details: Fedora-8 installation, and the upgraded to rawhide a ~2 months ago. Patch info: Yes, it was not an actual patch, I just wanted to show how I fixed my problem. Here is the info you asked: ============================================================= # rpm -q openjade openjade-1.3.2-31.fc9.i386 # rpm -V openjade prelink: /usr/bin/openjade: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?..... /usr/bin/openjade prelink: /usr/lib/libogrove.so.0.0.1: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?..... /usr/lib/libogrove.so.0.0.1 prelink: /usr/lib/libospgrove.so.0.0.1: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?..... /usr/lib/libospgrove.so.0.0.1 prelink: /usr/lib/libostyle.so.0.0.1: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?..... /usr/lib/libostyle.so.0.0.1 # rpm -q sgml-common sgml-common-0.6.3-23.fc9.noarch # rpm -V sgml-common # rpm -qf /usr/bin/install-catalog sgml-common-0.6.3-23.fc9.noarch ============================================================= Please let me know if I can provide more data. Regards, Devrim
Really strange. I have exactly same configuration (i386 architecture, same package versions) on my machine and updates work correctly. The only difference is that I have rpm -V openjade silent ... Tried once more time to go back to F8 packages and then update to RAWHIDE - worked again without troubles. Don't know what could be wrong - when updating Fedora it is always some kind of black magic (especially when updating to rawhide which could be broken almost any time), closing that bug WORKSFORME - as I tried the common update process on the same architecture as you have and with the packages you had/have. I'm quiet sure that the problem is in different area than openjade package - but I'm not able to say where and I doubt we can find it easily - it seems to be something caused by the update process.