First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 437738 - Oprofile hits binutils assertion
Oprofile hits binutils assertion
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: binutils (Show other bugs)
rawhide
ppc64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jakub Jelinek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-03-17 01:19 EDT by Anton Blanchard
Modified: 2008-04-07 10:56 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-07 10:56:27 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Anton Blanchard 2008-03-17 01:19:48 EDT 
Description of problem:

I ran opannotate -a on a ppc64 FC9 install and it hit the following binutils
assertion:

/usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.17 Debian GNU/Linux internal error, aborting at
../../bfd/elf64-ppc.c line 10571 in ppc64_elf_relocate_section

Discussion of a fix is at:

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-02/msg00099.html

I'll update the bug when a fix is committed to binutils.
Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2008-04-07 10:56:27 EDT 
Your binutils don't seem to be Fedora ones, but Debian.
binutils-2.18.50.0.4-2 that used to be in rawhide until recently had the
msg00099.html patch applied already, and so does the current 2.18.50.0.6-1.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.