Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 4378 - /usr/lib/libqt.so in wrong package
/usr/lib/libqt.so in wrong package
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: qt (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Preston Brown
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 1999-08-05 15:12 EDT by Pierre Phaneuf
Modified: 2017-05-10 01:47 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 1999-08-18 14:04:19 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Pierre Phaneuf 1999-08-05 15:12:04 EDT
The file /usr/lib/libqt.so is in the wrong package. This
symlink is used only during development, so it should be in

Including it in the main qt package causes problem when
someone wants to have both Qt 1.x and Qt 2.x side-by-side
(which works perfectly), by installing qt-2.x.rpm instead of
upgrading. This libqt.so file should always point to the
version of the library that correspond with the header files
installed on the system.

Note that the qt RPM in contrib has the same problem, but I
didn't notice the maintainer, maybe he just used your spec
Comment 1 Preston Brown 1999-08-18 14:04:59 EDT
This will be fixed in the next release of Red Hat Linux (6.1).
Comment 2 openshift-github-bot 2017-05-10 01:47:43 EDT
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs

GH-Issue: 4378: Fixing custom route hostname

Merge pull request #4396 from vikram-redhat/master

GH-Issue: 4378: Fixing custom route hostname

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.