Bug 4378 – /usr/lib/libqt.so in wrong package

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 4378 - /usr/lib/libqt.so in wrong package

Summary:	/usr/lib/libqt.so in wrong package

Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	qt (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Preston Brown
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	1999-08-05 15:12 EDT by Pierre Phaneuf
Modified:	2017-05-10 01:47 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	1999-08-18 14:04:19 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Pierre Phaneuf 1999-08-05 15:12:04 EDT

The file /usr/lib/libqt.so is in the wrong package. This
symlink is used only during development, so it should be in
qt-devel.

Including it in the main qt package causes problem when
someone wants to have both Qt 1.x and Qt 2.x side-by-side
(which works perfectly), by installing qt-2.x.rpm instead of
upgrading. This libqt.so file should always point to the
version of the library that correspond with the header files
installed on the system.

Note that the qt RPM in contrib has the same problem, but I
didn't notice the maintainer, maybe he just used your spec
file.

Comment 1 Preston Brown 1999-08-18 14:04:59 EDT

This will be fixed in the next release of Red Hat Linux (6.1).

Comment 2 openshift-github-bot 2017-05-10 01:47:43 EDT

Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs

https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/af8f09fa1f76ff8adca42587d963f3d52e6e2fa4
GH-Issue: 4378: Fixing custom route hostname

https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/45bc437a7343c28ee1b4641027f417e51ef2e9ba
Merge pull request #4396 from vikram-redhat/master

GH-Issue: 4378: Fixing custom route hostname

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.