Bug 437937 - udp packet duplication in localhost with multicast sendto()
Summary: udp packet duplication in localhost with multicast sendto()
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 4.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Neil Horman
QA Contact: Martin Jenner
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-03-18 10:28 UTC by keisuke kuzukawa
Modified: 2009-03-23 11:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-23 11:11:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description keisuke kuzukawa 2008-03-18 10:28:06 UTC
Description of problem:
UDP Packet duplication occurs when sendto() called within many process
at the same time. each processes are joined to different multicast addr,port.
ratio of duplication is around 0.6%-2.0% of all sent packet per 1 addr.
(verified by tcpdump)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
uname -a
Linux xxxxxxx 2.6.9-5.EL #1 Wed Jan 5 19:21:57 EST 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
GNU/Linux

How reproducible:
As the number of the processes increases, the packet repetition rate rises.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.send multicast packet with sendto().
2.capture any multicast group with tcpdump
3.
  
Actual results:
when 20 process startup, each process sent 10000 udp packet.
captured 1 multicast addr with tcpdump, and received 10003packet. 
3 packets was the same one sent just before.

Expected results:


Additional info:
it never happen if sendto() called sequential.

Comment 1 Neil Horman 2008-05-12 18:29:36 UTC
I'm going to set up a system to reproduce this.  In the interim, if you have a
copy of the tcpdump that you captured for me to review, that would be helpful. 
Thanks!

Comment 2 Neil Horman 2008-08-07 12:48:15 UTC
ping, any word on that tcpdump?

Comment 3 Neil Horman 2009-03-23 11:11:20 UTC
closing, no response


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.