Bug 4395
| Summary: | gprof still crashes with egcs g77 output | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | niles |
| Component: | binutils | Assignee: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | law |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | alpha | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 1999-08-27 16:30:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
niles
1999-08-06 15:49:25 UTC
One needs to compile gprof (binutils) with egcs 1.1.2-17. Or in other words, it doesn't matter (for this bug) what your program is compiled with, just what gprof was compiled with. As far as I know, we haven't made a fixed binutils package yet. Agreed, once I re-built the binutils package using the new egcs; gprof started worked fine. So probably mark this as a duplicate of Bug #3971 and close it. But, you really should release a new binary of binutils. Please try binutils-2.9.1.0.23-2 which should be in the next Rawhide release. Correction, the fixed binutils package is binutils-2.9.1.0.23-5. |