Bug 439612 - running java application fails with Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.
Summary: running java application fails with Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Thomas Fitzsimmons
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2008-03-29 16:52 UTC by Martin Jürgens
Modified: 2008-03-30 14:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-03-30 13:52:44 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Martin Jürgens 2008-03-29 16:52:15 UTC
Description of problem:
Running one of my java application fails with "Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
Every time
Actual results:
Locking assertion failure.  Backtrace:
#0 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 [0xc06767]
#1 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0(xcb_xlib_unlock+0x31) [0xc06831]
#2 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(_XReply+0x244) [0xc4cf64]
#3 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.6.0_02/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so [0xb576664e]
#4 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.6.0_02/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so [0xb5744f97]
#5 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.6.0_02/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so [0xb5745248]
#7 [0xb5d5166e]
#8 [0xb5d49edd]
#9 [0xb5d49edd]
#10 [0xb5d47243]
#11 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.6.0_02/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so [0x620bbbd]
#12 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.6.0_02/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so [0x630a6b8]
#13 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.6.0_02/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so [0x620ba50]
#16 [0xb5d5166e]
#17 [0xb5d49d77]
#18 [0xb5d47243]
#19 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.6.0_02/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so [0x620bbbd]
java: xcb_xlib.c:82: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

Expected results:
Should run, shouldn't it.

Additional info:
I think that it has worked using IcedTea. Now I upgraded and IcedTea got
replaced by openjdk and it does not work.

Comment 1 Lillian Angel 2008-03-30 13:52:44 UTC
This is fixed in IcedTea and OpenJDK.
You are running Sun's jdk - 1.6.0_02, this is still a problem here and should be filed with Sun.

Comment 2 Martin Jürgens 2008-03-30 14:40:36 UTC
You are right.. I am VERY sorry for the noise, didn't know that I had some older
java installation still present :(

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.