Bug 439684 - segfault in evince (regression since f8)
Summary: segfault in evince (regression since f8)
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 438970
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evince   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kristian Høgsberg
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-03-30 13:01 UTC by Mat Booth
Modified: 2008-04-02 12:13 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-02 12:13:25 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Pdf that triggers the crash (3.02 MB, application/pdf)
2008-03-30 13:01 UTC, Mat Booth
no flags Details

Description Mat Booth 2008-03-30 13:01:11 UTC
Description of problem:
Opening the attached pdf document (projector manual) in evince causes segfaults
in current Rawhide where it works perfectly in the F8 evince. The following
error is generated:

[mbooth@sd Desktop]$ evince e.pdf 
**
** ERROR:(ev-poppler.cc:868):EvLinkDest* ev_link_dest_from_dest(PdfDocument*,
PopplerDest*): assertion failed: (dest != NULL)
evince: xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int) ((xcb_req) -
(dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed.
Multiple segmentation faults occurred; can't display error dialog


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evince.x86_64  2.22.0-3.fc9  installed <--Rawhide version that segfaults
evince.i386    2.20.2-1.fc8  installed <--F8 version that works

How reproducible:
Every time.

Actual results:
Evince opens briefly before disappearing without a trace.

Expected results:
Opens document as it does in F8

Comment 1 Mat Booth 2008-03-30 13:01:12 UTC
Created attachment 299624 [details]
Pdf that triggers the crash

Comment 2 Osma Ahvenlampi 2008-03-31 07:54:02 UTC
possibly dupes #438970

Comment 3 Michal Schmidt 2008-04-02 12:13:25 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 438970 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.