Bug 440278 – anaconda traceback on nfs kickstart install, F9 beta

Bug 440278 - anaconda traceback on nfs kickstart install, F9 beta

Summary:	anaconda traceback on nfs kickstart install, F9 beta

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	anaconda (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	9
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Anaconda Maintenance Team
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2008-04-02 12:03 EDT by Eric Sandeen
Modified:	2008-06-21 16:18 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-06-21 16:18:20 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
anaconda traceback (585.21 KB, text/plain) 2008-04-02 12:05 EDT, Eric Sandeen	no flags	Details
kickstart file (3.80 KB, text/plain) 2008-04-02 12:05 EDT, Eric Sandeen	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Eric Sandeen 2008-04-02 12:03:56 EDT

From F9 beta, i386

booted with extra arg ks=http://10.0.0.55/fedora/eee.ks (grabbed from Davej's
example)

Got anaconda spew... will attach both ks file and traceback file.

Comment 1 Eric Sandeen 2008-04-02 12:05:21 EDT

Created attachment 300085 [details]
anaconda traceback

Comment 2 Eric Sandeen 2008-04-02 12:05:52 EDT

Created attachment 300086 [details]
kickstart file

Comment 3 Chris Lumens 2008-04-02 12:10:15 EDT

Is this better post-beta?

Comment 4 Eric Sandeen 2008-04-02 16:06:46 EDT

I don't have the bandwidth right now to do a full update past beta, but I
grabbed images/*.iso and images/*.img from rawhide, put them in my local repo,
booted  boot.iso and tried kickstart.  (If doing so is a horrible abuse and not
expected to work, let me know...)

For some reason X failed, but then the text mode installer proceeded without the
error.

... I should probably try it for real instead of with a patchwork install source
when I'm back in the office ...

Comment 5 Chris Lumens 2008-04-07 10:17:09 EDT

Okay I think this should be fixed, so I'm going to move it into MODIFIED for
now.  Feel free to put it back if your retesting shows it to still be broken.

Comment 6 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 04:35:30 EDT

Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.