Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 440633

Summary: there should be %{?dist} instead of %{dist} in the *.spec on the Release: line
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component: libbtctlAssignee: Tomáš Hozza <thozza>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.2CC: rvokal
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-07 17:44:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 440605    
Attachments:
Description Flags
fixed spec file none

Description Jan Hutař 2008-04-04 11:08:36 UTC
Description of problem:
There should be "%{?dist}" instead of "%{dist}" in the *.spec file on the 
"Release:" line.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libbtctl-0.6.0-9.2.el5


Additional info:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag

Comment 1 Jiri Moskovcak 2008-07-10 08:46:22 UTC
Created attachment 311459 [details]
fixed spec file

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2009-03-26 16:50:50 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 8 Tomáš Hozza 2013-03-07 17:44:03 UTC
I am sorry, but it is now too late in the RHEL-5 release cycle.
RHEL-5.10 (the next RHEL-5 minor release) is going to be the first
production phase 2 [1] release of RHEL-5. Phase 2 we'll be addressing
only security and critical issues. Since this one is a "low" severity
issue, I am closing this bug as WONTFIX.

[1] https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/