Bug 442218 - Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps
Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee a...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: manuel wolfshant
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-04-12 18:00 EDT by Tom "spot" Callaway
Modified: 2008-04-12 21:26 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-04-12 21:26:28 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
wolfy: fedora‑review+
tcallawa: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-04-12 18:00:42 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp-

TagLib# is a FREE and Open Source library for the .NET 2.0 and Mono frameworks
which will let you tag your software with as much or as little detail as you
like without slowing you down. It supports a large variety of movie and music
formats which abstract away the work, handling all the different cases, so all
you have to do is access file.Tag.Title, file.Tag.Lyrics, or my personal
favorite file.Tag.Pictures. But don't think all this abstraction is gonna keep
you from tagging's greatest gems. You can still get to a specific tag type's
features with just a few lines of code.

NOTE: We need this to bring Banshee up to spec in F-9.
Comment 3 manuel wolfshant 2008-04-12 20:00:21 EDT
Package Review (taglib-sharp-

 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: devel/x86_64
 [x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:
taglib-sharp.x86_64: E: no-binary
taglib-sharp.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
taglib-sharp-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
--> false alarms
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type:LGPLv2+
note: sources are a mix of different licenses but LGPLv2+ seems to be the common
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
     SHA1SUM of package: 648a26d64df48e460e0a196b99bc706d11f726f0 
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: devel/x86_64
 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     Tested on:
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.

*** APPROVED ***
Comment 4 manuel wolfshant 2008-04-12 20:02:01 EDT
obs: there is only one minor nitpick: pkgconfig gets pulled in by mono-devel
which would count as an [indirect] duplicate BR
Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-04-12 20:10:45 EDT
I'll fix that before I commit, thanks.

New Package CVS Request
Package Name: taglib-sharp 
Short Description: Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps
Owners: spot
Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 devel
Cvsextras Commits: yes
Comment 6 Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-04-12 20:17:23 EDT
cvs done.
Comment 7 Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-04-12 21:26:28 EDT
Built, thanks.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.