Bug 443301 - Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility
Summary: Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 328161
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-04-20 13:04 UTC by Nigel Jones
Modified: 2008-04-21 21:37 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-21 21:37:27 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nigel Jones 2008-04-20 13:04:38 UTC
Spec URL: 
SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance-0.20-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: 
Concordance enables users of the Logitech Harmony series of universal remote
controls to update their firmware and configuration information from within
linux.

rpmlint issues:
libconcord-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libconcord-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libconcord-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation

There is no suitable documentation...

libconcord-perl.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/concord/concord.bs

I'm not 100% sure about this one, if someone can confirm it's not needed, then I'll %exclude in next revision

libconcord-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod

Ditto

libconcord-perl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/concord/concord.so 0555

Seems to match other similar files.

Nothing seems critical to me...

Just as a note though...
I've had a hell of a job getting the configure scripts to understand LDFLAGS/CFLAGS in places, hence the patches and sed's so per guidelines ( Adding to and overriding or filtering parts of these flags is permitted if there's a good reason to do so; the rationale for doing so should be reviewed and documented in the specfile especially in the override and filter cases.) I've done the patching...

Comment 2 Nigel Jones 2008-04-21 04:52:03 UTC
Okay, so I made a bit of a boo-boo...  new version...

Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance.spec
SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance-0.20-2.fc8.src.rpm

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=574360


Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2008-04-21 19:11:00 UTC
It seems to be already submitted in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161

Comment 4 Nigel Jones 2008-04-21 21:37:27 UTC
Hmmm, I have *no* idea how I missed that okay, closing...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 328161 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.