Bug 443459 - RFE: process explicit deps. before implicit ones to try to reduce pulling in extra deps.
Summary: RFE: process explicit deps. before implicit ones to try to reduce pulling in ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum
Version: 9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Seth Vidal
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F10Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-04-21 17:35 UTC by Bastien Nocera
Modified: 2014-01-21 23:02 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-24 20:11:13 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
yum-totem.txt (15.79 KB, text/plain)
2008-04-21 17:35 UTC, Bastien Nocera
no flags Details

Description Bastien Nocera 2008-04-21 17:35:49 UTC
yum-3.2.14-10.fc9.noarch

Doing a "yum install totem" should be dragging in totem-gstreamer, not _both_
totem-gstreamer and totem-xine.

The main totem package has a requires on "totem-gstreamer", but the
libbaconvideowidget.so.0 dependency will resolve to totem-xine (because of the
shorter name?), so both packages will be installed.

Comment 1 Bastien Nocera 2008-04-21 17:35:49 UTC
Created attachment 303180 [details]
yum-totem.txt

Comment 2 James Antill 2008-04-21 17:43:26 UTC
 Yeh, one of the things we are thinking of doing, after Fed-9 is out, is
processing all the explicit dependencies first ... which should solve a couple
of the problems like this.
 Until something like that goes in though, it's going to stay as is.


Comment 3 Thomas J. Baker 2008-04-29 13:57:53 UTC
Too bad as it makes it seem like totem is completely busted. I couldn't figure
out why totem wouldn't play much of anything even though I had the other
gstreamer-based apps working fine. Turns out totem-xine was installed and was
mucking up the works. This on two systems from preview installs. I don't imagine
this could be fixed in the comps as the dependency would still be pulled in?

Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 09:52:30 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 5 James Antill 2008-08-07 18:50:50 UTC
This is also releated to: bug 442626

Comment 6 James Antill 2008-08-09 19:25:26 UTC
 A commit I just did today orders requires which I'm pretty sure will solve the above.
 upstream commit 92f360344742fa3fca38d97846cb7a31f3dd88bf

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2008-10-24 20:11:13 UTC
Verified.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.