URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jna-posix.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jna-posix-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Common cross-project/cross-platform POSIX APIs for Java. Note: this is a dependency of JRuby 1.1.1. I've built it in Koji (no missing BR's) at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577179 .
* Spec looks fine - I'd change the rm lib/jna.jar to: rm lib/*.jar to be safe x rpmlint says: jna-posix.noarch: W: no-documentation, need %doc README.txt ? Why do we have a custom build.xml instead of using mvn-jpp?
(In reply to comment #1) > * Spec looks fine > - I'd change the rm lib/jna.jar to: rm lib/*.jar to be safe Sure. > x rpmlint says: jna-posix.noarch: W: no-documentation, need %doc README.txt Oops :). > ? Why do we have a custom build.xml instead of using mvn-jpp? From the looks of the pom.xml it required wagon-WebDAV, which isn't a part of Fedora's maven-wagon package. I've opened a bug for that a while ago (rhbz# 442641). I'm also lazy and this custom build.xml works fine.
New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jna-posix.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jna-posix-0.5-2.fc8.src.rpm Added README.txt and LICENSE.txt to %doc, rm lib/*.jar in %prep, and keep custom build.xml for now.
Hmm, ok. Can you add a comment linking to #442641 above your Source: build.xml then? Otherwise looks good, approved.
Will do. Can you set fedora_cvs to '+' before I ask for CVS? Thanks!
Sorry, I meant fedora_review -- thanks for understanding. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jna-posix Short Description: POSIX APIs for Java Owners: konradm,walters Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes
CVS done. (I created an F-9 branch as well.)
Has this not been closed yet? I think it's been pushed to updates. Closing.